data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e024/1e024270cd164447119fde7160a9bb53a24c5580" alt=""
Some facts about the new owners. David Gillet has made his money out of processed meat and ski resorts. He was declared bankrupt in the early 1990s but has since bounced back. Tom Hicks made his money from venture capital, investment firms and soft drinks. He also donated money to Ann Richards, the Governor of Texas, in the early 1990s but shifted his donations to George W. Bush when Ann Richards lost an election in 1994. Hicks has since become the number 4 career patron of Bush during his career. In 1998, Hicks made Bush a multi-millionaire by buying a Texas baseball team from a consortium headed by Bush.
The new owners have expressed an interest in selling the name of the new stadium to an advertiser "If the naming rights are worth one great player a year in transfer spending, we will certainly look at that as a serious option." Yeah, right. The name of the old stadium, 'Anfield', conjures up rich images of football heritage and success whereas modern 'branded' football stadiums have names like 'kit-kat crescent' which conjures up images of over-sugary chocolate bars mass produced in factory production lines staffed by workers on low wages in York whose jobs have been taken away and moved abroad where the cheaper workers are.
On the news tonight a Liverpool fan was heard to mutter that he preferred the club to be in American hands rather than the club be owned by the consortium from Dubai who recently expressed an interest. He never explained why. Maybe the fact that the Americans are white makes it OK that they are running a club in the hope of gaining "on-the-pitch success and economic success". The latter is the prime reason for investing in top-flight English football. They definitely don't know anything about football judging by the comment "this is the most important club in the most important sport in the world".
No comments:
Post a Comment